Оценка качества жизни больных мочекаменной болезнью в зависимости от вида дренирования верхних мочевых путей
Диссертация
Анализ полученных результатов социологического исследования с использованием стандартизированных, апробированных международными клиническими исследованиями опросников оценки качества жизни пациентов (SF-36 и EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0) показал, что наружное и внутреннее дренирование верхних мочевых путей в равной степени ухудшает качество жизни пациентов. Пациенты с установленным мочеточниковым… Читать ещё >
Содержание
- Глава 1. Оценка качества жизни пациентов, страдающих мочекаменной болезнью (Обзор литературы)
- 1. 1. Эпидемиология мочекаменной болезни в России и за рубежом
- 1. 2. Современные методы дренирования верхних мочевых путей
- 1. 3. Оценка качества жизни пациентов, страдающих мочекаменной болезнью
- Глава 2. Материалы и методы
- 2. 1. Объем клинического исследования
- 2. 2. Клинико-лабораторные методы исследования
- 2. 3. Инструментальные методы исследования
- 2. 4. Методы дренирования верхних мочевых путей
- 2. 5. Методы оценки качества жизни
- 2. 6. Статистическая обработка полученных результатов
- Глава 3. Определение показаний к выбору метода дренирования верхних мочевых путей
- 3. 1. Анализ распространенности мочекаменной болезни в Московской области
- 3. 2. Мочекаменная болезнь в структуре урологической патологии урологической клиники МОНИКИ
- 3. 3. Клинико-лабораторная характеристика наблюдаемых контингентов больных
- Глава 4. Оценка качества жизни больных мочекаменной болезнью в зависимости от способа дренирования верхних мочевых путей
Список литературы
- Абрамян А.Я. Отдаленные результаты после операций по поводу камней почек // В кн.: Нефролитиаз: материалы клиники МОКИ-ЦИУ. М., 1937.
- Авдошин В.П., Андрюхин М. И., Ольшанская Е. В. Мочекаменная болезнь // Лечащий врач. 2008. — № 1. — С. 42−45.
- Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л. М., Руденко В. И., Григорьев Н. А. Мочекаменная болезнь. Актуальные вопросы диагностики и лечения // Врачебное сословие. -2004,-№ 4.-С. 4−9.
- Аполихин О.И. Состояние оказания урологической помощи в России // В кн.: Материалы 11-го Рос. съезда урологов. М., 2007. — С. 8−9.
- Беиишев Д.А. Опасности, ошибки, осложнения дистанционной литотрипсии. Их лечение и профилактика: Дне.. докт. мед. наук. М., 2003.
- Вощула В.И. Мочекаменная болезнь: этиотропное и патогенетическое лечение, профилактика. Минск: ВЭВЭР, 2006.-268 с.
- Ггшпелъсон Э.И. Камни почек и мочеточников. — М., 1956. С. 5−6.
- Годовые медицинские статистические отчеты о деятельности лечебно-профилактических учреждений Московской области. Подборка форм 12,14 и 30 государственной отчетности за период 1995—2007 гг., утвержденных Госкомстатом России. -М.: МОНИКИ, 1995−2007.
- Гублер Е.В. Вычислительные методы анализа и распознавания патологических процессов. Л.: Медицина, 1978. —296 с.
- Демографический энциклопедический словарь. М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1985.
- Дзеранов Н.К., Бешлиев Д. А. Лечение мочекаменной болезни комплексная медицинская проблема // Consilium medicum. Прил. Урология. — 2003. — С. 18−22.
- Дзеранов Н.К., Лопаткш Н. А. Мочекаменная болезнь. Клинические рекомендации. М.: Оверлей, 2007. — 296 с.
- Дутов В.В. Современные аспекты лечения некоторых форм мочекаменной болезни: Дис.. докт. мед. наук. -М., 2000.
- Зырянов А.В. Особенности лечения больных камнями верхней и средней трети мочеточника: Дис.. канд. мед. наук. -М., 1995.
- Игнашии Н.С., Мартов А. Г., Морозов А. В. и др. Диапедевтика в урологии. — М.: ИПО «Полигран», 1993. 200 с.
- Колпаков И.С. Мочекаменная болезнь. М.: Academia, 2006. — 224 с.
- Лопаткнн Н.А., Янеико Э. К., Румянцев В. Б., Датшков А. П. Окклюзирующий фактор в развитии осложнений мочекаменной болезни // Урол. и нефрол. 1999. -№ 1.-С.5−8.
- Малкоч А.В. Дисметаболические нефропатии и мочекаменная болезнь // В кн.: Нефрология детского возраста: Практическое руководство по детским болезням. М.: Медпрактика-М, 2005. — Т. 6. — С. 472−516.
- Новик А.А., Ионова Т. И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине / Под ред. Ю. Л. Шевченко. М.: ОЛМА-медиагрупп, 2007. — С. 11−111.
- Новик А.А., Ионова Т. Н., Кайнд П. Концепция исследования качества жизни в медицине. СПб.: Элби, 1999. — 140 с.
- Перепанова Т. С. Комплексное лечение и профилактика госпитальной инфекции мочевых путей: Дис.. докт. мед. наук. -М., 1996.
- Руководство по урологии: В 3 т. / Под ред. Н. А. Лопаткина. М.: Медицина, 1998.-Т. 2.-С. 693−761.
- Скоромец Н.М., Чернова Т. В., Елфгшов П. В. Бородина З.И. Результаты анкетирования пациентов врача общей практики // Здравоохр. Рос. Федерации. — 1997.-№ 3.-С. 21−22.
- Тиктинскгш О.Л., Александров В. Б. Мочекаменная болезнь. СПб., 2000. — 379 с.
- Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В. В. Современные аспекты дистанционной литотрипсии // Урол. и нефрол. 1999. — № 1. — С. 8−12.
- Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В. В., Румянцев А. А. Современные аспекты диагностики и лечения мочекаменной болезни у детей // Врачебное сословие. -2004.-№>3.-С. 8−12.
- Control. Clin. Trials. 1989. — Vol. 10. — P. 195−208. 32. Adams J. Renal stents // Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. — 1994. — Vol. 12, No. 3. — P. 749−758.
- Ahmed I., Rizvi I.H., Aslam A. et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous nephrostomy in reversing obstructive renal failure // J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 1995. — Vol. 45, No. 1. — P. 16−18.
- Ahn J., Trost D. W., Topham S.L., Sos T.A. Retained nephrostomy thread providing a nidus for atypical renal calcification // Br. J. Radiol. 1997. — Vol. 70. — P. 309−310.
- Alsikafr N.F., O’Connor R.C., Kuznetsov D.D. et al. Prospective evaluation of ureteral stent durability in patients with chronic ureteral obstruction // Urology. 2002. — Vol. 59, No. 6.-P. 847−850.
- Атапо Т., Matsui F., Takashima H., Takemae K. Analysis of patients with septic shock due to urosepsis brought on by ureteral calculi // Hinyokika Kiyo. 2003. -Vol. 49, No. l.-P. 1−4.
- Aridogan 1.А., Zeren S., Bayazit Y. et al. Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period // J. Endourol. 2005. — Vol. 19, No. l.-P. 50−53.
- Atallah N., Slaba S., Karam R. et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy. Apropos of 481 procedures: the value of puncture of the median calices // J. Med. Liban. 1999. — Vol. 47, No. 2. — P. 92−94.
- Bennani S., Debbagh A., Joual A. et al. Obstructive anuria. Thirty cases // Ann. Urol. (Paris). 1995. — Vol. 29, No. 3. — P. 159−162.
- Borrell Palanca A., Ferrer Puchol M.D., Villamon Fort R., Gil Romero J. Anterograde insertion of ureteral catheter // Actas Urol. Esp. 2000. — Vol. 24, No. 3. -P. 243−247.
- Bullinger M, Alonso J., Apolone G. et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the international quality of life assessment project approach // J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998. — Vol. 51, No. 11. — P. 913−923.
- Byrne R.R., Auge B.K., Kourambas J. et al. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: a randomized trial // J. Endourol. 2002. — Vol. 16, No. l.-P. 9−13.
- Cadieux P.A., Chew B.H., Knudsen B.E. et al. Triclosan loaded ureteral stents decrease proteus mirabilis 296 infection in a rabbit urinary tract infection model // J. Urol. 2006. — Vol. 175, No. 6. — P. 2331−2335.
- Campbell S.C., Walsh P.C. Pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction // In: Campbell-Walsh Urology / Ed. J. Wein. 9th ed. — N.Y.: Saunders, 2007. — Vol. 2. -P.1195−1226.
- Candela J. V., Bellman G.C. Ureteral stents: impact of diameter and composition on patient symptoms 11 J. Endourol. 1997. — Vol. 11, No. 1. — P. 4517.
- Chandhoke P. S., Barqawi A.Z., Wernecke C., Chee-Awai R.A. A randomized outcomes trial of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of solitary kidney or proximal ureteral stones // J. Urol. 2002. — Vol. 167, No. 5. — P. 1981−1983.
- Chen C.K., Li C.C., Ke H.L. et al. Double-J stent forgotten for 7 years: a case report // Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2003. — Vol. 19, No. 2. — P. 84−87.
- Chen Y.T., Chen J., Wong W.Y. et al. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial I I J. Urol.-2002.-Vol. 167, No. 5.-P. 1977−1980.
- Cheung M.C., Lee F., Leung Y.L. et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial on ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy // J. Urol. 2003. — Vol. 169, No. 4.-P. 1257−1260.
- Chew B.H., Duvdevani M., Denstedt J.D. New developments in ureteral stent design, materials and coatings // Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2006. — Vol. 3, No. 3. — P. 395−403.
- Chew B.H., Knudsen B.E., Denstedt J.D. The use of stents in contemporary urology // Curr. Opin. Urol. 2004. — Vol. 14, No. 2. — P. 111−115.
- Coates A.S., Porzsolt F., Osoba D. Quality of life in oncology practice: prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy // Eur. J. Cancer. 1997.-Vol. 33.-P. 1025−1030.
- Damiano R., Autorino R., Esposito C. et al. Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open //Eur. Urol. 2004. — Vol. 46, No. 3. — P. 381−387.
- Damiano R., Oliva A., Esposito C. et al. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent // Urol. Int. 2002. — Vol. 69, No 2. — P. 136−140.
- De Luca S., Milan G.L., Zitella A. et al. Large calcifications on double-J ureteral endoprosthesis «forgotten» in situ. Report of a clinical case // Minerva Urol. Nefrol. -2000. Vol. 52, No. 4. — P. 211−214.
- Del Boca C., Ferrari C., Dotti E. et al. The combination of extracorporeal lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostomy in the treatment of obstructive ureteral urate calculi // Radiol. Med. (Torino). 1994. — Vol. 87, No. 4. — P. 498−502.
- Deliveliotis C., Chrisofos M., Gougousis E. et al. Is there a role for alpha 1-blockers in treating double-J stent-relatcd symptoms? // Urology. 2006. — Vol. 67, No. 1. — P. 35−39.
- Denstedt J.D., Wollin T.A., Sofer M. et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy // J. Urol. 2001. -Vol. 165, No. 5.-P. 1419−1422.
- Duvdevani M., Chew B.H., Denstedt J.D. Minimizing symptoms in patients with ureteric stents // Curr. Opin. Urol. 2006. — Vol. 16, No. 2. — P. 77−82.
- Dyer R.B., Chen M.Y., Zagoria R.J. et al. Complications of ureteral stent placement // Radiographics. 2002. — Vol. 22, No. 5. — P. 1005−1022.
- Dzeranov N.K., Baibarin K.A., Kazachenko A.V. Quality of life of elderly patients with nephrolithiasis // Urologiia. 2006. — Vol. 1. — P. 7−11.
- El-Assmy A., El-Nahas A.R., Sheir K.Z. Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis // J. Urol. -2006. Vol. 176, No. 5. — P. 2059−2062.
- El Khader К. Complications of double J ureteral stents // J. Urol. (Paris). 1996. -Vol. 102, No. 4, — 173−175.
- El-Nahas A.R., El-Assmy A.M., Shoma A.M. et al. Self-retaining ureteral stents: analysis of factors responsible for patients' discomfort // J. Endourol. 2006. — Vol. 20, No. l.-P. 33−37.
- Erturk E., Sessions A., Joseph J. V. Impact of ureteral stent diameter on symptoms and tolerability // J. Endourol. 2003. — Vol. 17, No. 2. — P. 59−62.
- Fairclongh D. Method of analysis for longitudinal studies of health-related quality of life // In: Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials. Oxford-N.Y.-Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 1998. — P. 227−247.
- Ferrandino M., Preminger G.M. Updated guidelines for the management of ureteral calculi // In: Urology Times Clinical Edition. Arnhem, 2009.
- Ferrer M.D., Palmero J., Martinez-Rodrigo J. et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy. Review of 92 cases // Actas Urol. Esp. 1995. — Vol. 19, No. 7.-P. 555−560.
- Fine H., Gordon R.L., Lebensart P.D. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stents: fluoroscopic observation and a hypothesis on the mechanism of stent function //Urol. Radiol.- 1989.-Vol. 11, No. l.-P. 37−41.
- Finney R.P. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. 1978 // J. Urol. -2002.-Vol. 16 7, No. 2.-P. 1135−1138.
- Fonmier G., Delavierre D., Le Coat R. et al. Percutaneous drainage nephrostomy in patients over 70 years of age. Apropos of 98 nephrostomies in 74 patients // Prog. Urol. 1994.-Vol. 4, No. 3.-P. 362−370.
- Franczyk J., Gray R.R. Ureteral stenting in urosepsis: a cautionaiy note // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1989. — Vol. 12, No. 5. — P. 265−266.
- Galvin D.J., Pearle M.S. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi //BJU Int. -2006.- Vol. 98, No. 6. P. 1283−1288.
- Geavlete P., Georgescu D., Nita G. et al. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience // J. Endourol. 2006. — Vol. 20, No. 3.-P. 179−185.
- Gibbons R.P., Mason J.T., Correa R.J. Experience with indwelling silicone rubber ureteral catheters // J. Urol. 1974. — Vol. 111, No. 5. — P. 594−599.
- Gonzalez Enguita C., Cabrera Perez J., Calahorra Fernandez F.J. et al. Treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves // Arch. Esp. Urol. 2001. — Vol. 54, No. 9. — P. 971−982.
- Gupta S., Gulati M., Suri S. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy in non-dilated pericaliceal system // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1998. — Vol. 26, No. 3. — P. 177−179.
- Guyatt G., Feeny D" Patrick D. Issues in quality-of-life measurement in clinical trials //Control. Clin. Trials. 1991.-Vol. 12.-Suppl. 4.-P. 81S-90S.
- Hagspiel K.D., Kandarpa K., Silverman S.G. Interactive MR-guided percutaneous nephrostomy // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 1998. — Vol. 8, No. 6. — P. 1319−1322.
- Haleblian G., Kijvikai K., de la Rosette J., Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review // J. Urol. 2008. — Vol. 179, No. 2. — P. 424−430.
- Haritopoulos K., Hakim N. Ureteral stents and their current use // Int. Surg. 2006. -Vol. 91, No. 1.-P. 9−11.
- Hausegger K.A., Portugaller H.R. Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications // Eur. Radiol. 2006. — Vol. 16, No. 9. -P. 2016−2030.
- Heimbach D., Wirth M" Hofmockel G., Frohmuller H. Are auxiliary methods necessary prior to ESWL in patients with a solitary kidney? // Urol. Int. 1994. -Vol. 52, No. 3. — P. 131−134.
- Hepperlen T. W., Mardis H.K., Kammandel H. Self-retained internal ureteral stents: a new approach//J. Urol. 1978. — Vol. 119, No. 6. — P. 731−734.
- Hollowell C.M., Patel R.V., Bales G.T., Gerber G.S. Internet and postal survey of endourologic practice patterns among American urologists // J. Urol. 2000. — Vol. 163, No. 6.-P. 1779−1782.
- Hussain M., Lai M" Ali B. et al. Management of urinary calculi associated with renal failure // J. Рак. Med. Assoc. 1995. — Vol. 45, No. 8. — P. 205−208.
- Ibrahim KM., Al-Kandari A.M., Shaaban H.S. et al. Role of ureteral stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial // J. Urol. 2008. — Vol. 180, No. 3. — P. 961−965.
- Ike da R., Suzuki K., Tsugawa R. Damage attributable to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and deposition of calcium oxalate crystals on ureteral stents // J. Endourol. 1997.-Vol. 11, No. 2.-P. 113−118.
- Ilker Y., Turkeri L., Dillioglugil O., Akdas A. Spontaneous fracture of indwelling ureteral stents in patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: two case reports // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1996. — Vol. 28, No. 1. — P. 15−19.
- Ingham J., Portenoy R.K. The measurement of pain and other symptoms // In: Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine / Eds. D. Doyl, G.W.C. Hanks, N. McDonald. 2nd ed. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. — P. 203−213.
- Jeong II., Kwak C., Lee S.E. Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications // BJU Int. -2004. Vol. 93, No. 7. — P. 1032−1034.
- Joshi H.B., Adams S., Obadeyi O.O., Rao P.N. Nephrostomy tube or «Л» ureteric stent in ureteric obstruction: assessment of patient perspectives using quality-of-life survey and utility analysis // Eur. Urol. 2001. — Vol. 39, No. 6. — P. 695−701.
- Joshi H.B., Chitale S. V., Nagarajan M. et al. A prospective randomized single-blind comparison of ureteral stents composed of firm and soft polymer I! J. Urol. 2005. -Vol. 174, No. 6. — P. 2303−2306.
- Joshi H.B., Obadeyi O.O., Rao P.N. A comparative analysis of nephrostomy, JJ stent and urgent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteric stones // BJU Int. 1999. — Vol. 84, No. 3. — P. 264−269.
- Joshi H.B., Okeke A., Newns N. et al. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents // Urology. 2002. — Vol. 59, No. 4. — P. 511−516.
- Joshi H.B., Stainthorpe A., Keeley F.X.Jr. et al. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis // J. Endourol. 2001. — Vol. 15, No. 2.-P. 151−154.
- Joshi H.B., Stainthorpe A., MacDonagh R.P. et al. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility // J. Urol. 2003. — Vol. 169, No. 3.-P. 1065−1069.
- Kaskarelis I.S., Papadaki M.G., Malliaraki N.E. et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy, percutaneous insertion of ureteral endoprosthesis, and replacement procedures // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2001. — Vol. 24, No. 4. -P. 224−228.
- Keeley F.X.Jr., Tilling K., Elves A. et al. Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones // BJU Int. 2001. — Vol. 87, No 1. — P. 1−8.
- Keeley F.X.Jr., Timoney A.G. Routine stenting after ureteroscopy: think again // Eur. Urol. 2007. — Vol. 52, No. 3. — P. 642−644.
- Kleinmann J., Siegel Y., Cipele H. et al. Factors affecting tube indwelling time after percutaneous nephrolithotomy // J. Endourol. 2001. — Vol. 15, No. 8. — P. 793−795.
- Kontothanassis D., Bissas A. Biliary peritonitis complicating percutaneous nephrostomy //Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1997. — Vol. 29, No. 5. — P. 529−531.
- LalakN.J., Moussa S.A., Smith G" Tolley DA. The Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter: the first 150 ureteral calculi I I J. Endourol. 2002. — Vol. 16, No. 9. — P. 645−648.
- Lawrentsehuk N., Russell J.M. Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky? // ANZ J. Surg. 2004. — Vol. 74, No. 4. — P. 243−247.
- Lee C., Kuskowski M., Premoli J. et al. Randomized evaluation of ureteral stents using validated symptom Questionnaire // J. Endourol. 2005. — Vol. 19, No. 8. — P. 990−993.
- Lee W.J., Patel U., PatelS., Pillari G.P. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications //J. Vase. Interv. Radiol. 1994. — Vol. 5, No. 1. — P. 135−139.
- Leventhal E.K., Rozanski' T.A., С rain T.W., Deshon G.E.Jr. Indwelling ureteral stents as definitive therapy for distal ureteral calculi // J. Urol. — 1995. Vol. 153, No. l.-P. 34−36.
- Lewis B. History of urology. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1993.
- Lifshitz D.A., Winkler H.Z., Gross M. et al Predictive value of urinary cultures in assessment of microbial colonization of ureteral stents // J. Endourol. 1999. — Vol. 13, No. 10.-P. 735−738.
- Lingeman J.E., Preminger G.M., Berger Y. et al. Use of a temporary ureteral drainage stent after uncomplicated uretcroscopy: results from a phase II clinical trial // J. Urol. -2003. Vol. 169, No. 5. — P. 1682−1688.
- Lojanapiwat B. Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents // J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2005. — Vol. 88, No. 9. — P. 1203−1206.
- Low R.K., Stoller M.L., Irby P. et al. Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi // J. Endourol. -1996.-Vol. 10, No. 4.-P. 341−343.
- Marberger M. Urinary stones // Curr. Opin. Urol. 1999. — Vol. 9, No. 4. — P. 315−317.
- Martino P. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy // Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2000. — Vol. 72, No. 4. — P. 324−327.
- Matjosaitis A., Rinkunas G., Bosas P. Percutaneous nephrostomy at the Second Kaunas Clinical Hospital // Medicina (Kaunas). 2002. — Vol. 38, Suppl. l.-P. 76−78.
- Matsuda J., Bessho Й, Kamizuru M., Terada T. Clinical results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stone using Siemens Lithostar 2 // Hinyokika Kiyo. 1997. — Vol. 43, No. 7. — P. 467−470.
- Mattel A., Danuser H. Stents in urology // Ther. Umsch. 2003. — Vol. 60, No. 4. -P. 233−237.
- Mays N.B., Petruckevitch A., Snowdon C. Patients quality of life following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi // Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 1990. — Vol. 6, No. 4. — P. 633−642.
- Michalopoulos A.S., Tzoufi M.J., Theodorakis G., Mentzelopoulos S.D. Acute postoperative pulmonary thromboembolism as a result of intravascular migration of a pigtail ureteral stent // Anesth. Analg. 2002. — Vol. 95, No. 5. — P. 1185−1188.
- Miller N.L., Lingeman J.E. Management of kidney stones // Br. Med. J. 2007. -Vol. 334.-P. 468−472.
- Mischianu D., Vlasin G., Dinu M, Bana M. The indications and limits for the use of stents in urological pathology //Chirurgia (Bucur). 1998.-Vol. 93, No. 6.-P. 387−394.
- Mobley T.B., Myers D.A., Jenkins J.M. et al. Effects of stents on lithotripsy of ureteral calculi: treatment results with 18,825 calculi using the Lithostar lithotripter // J. Urol. 1994. — Vol. 152, No. 1. — P. 53−56.
- Mokhmalji II., Braun P.M., Martinez Portillo F.J. et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial // J. Urol. 2001. — Vol. 165, No. 4. — P. 1088−1092.
- Morris A., Perez D., McNoe B. The use of quality of life data in clinical practice // Qual. Life Res. 1998. — Vol. 7. — P. 85−91.
- Mudraia I.S., Zenkov S.S., Martov A.G., Kirpatovskii V.I. The effect of ureteral stents on the peristalsis of the upper urinary tracts // Urol. Nefrol. (Mosk.). 1998. -Vol. 5.-P. 31−35.
- Musa A.A. Use of double-J stents prior to shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2008. — Vol. 40, No. l.-P. 19−22.
- Mydlo J.H., Streater S. The applicability of using straight ureteral stents for the treatment of ureteral stones in presumably non-compliant patients // Urol. Int. 2001. — Vol. 66, No. 4. — P. 201−204.
- Nabi G., Cook J., N’Dow J., McClinton S. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis // Br. Med. J. — 2007. Vol. 334. -P. 572.
- Nakada S.Y., Pearle M.S., Soble J.J. et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of middle ureteral stones: are ureteral stents necessary? // Urology. 1995. — Vol. 46, No. 5.-P. 649−652.
- Netto N.RJr., Ikonomidis J., Zillo C. Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: is it really necessary? 11 J. Urol. 2001. — Vol. 166, No. 4. — P. 1252−1254.
- Ng C.K., Yip S.K., Sim L.S. et al. Outcome of percutaneous nephrostomy for the management of pyonephrosis // Asian J. Surg. 2002. — Vol. 25, No. 3. — P. 215−219.
- Pareja Vilches M., Arrabal Martin M., Mijan Ortiz J.L. et al. Extracorporeal lithotripsy in lumbar ureteral lithiasis. Is the ureteral catheter necessary? // Arch. Esp. Urol. 2002. — Vol. 55, No. 10. — P. 251−258.
- Park B.K., Kim S.H., Moon M.H. Nonvascular interventions of the urinary tract // J. Korean Med. Sci. 2002. — Vol. 17, No. 6. — P. 727−736.
- Pearle M.S., Pierce H.L., Miller G.L. et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi // J. Urol. 1998. — Vol. 160, No. 4. — P. 1260−1264.
- Penniston K.L., Nakada S.Y. Health related quality of life differs between male and female stone formers // J. Urol. 2007. — Vol. 178, No. 6. — P. 2435−2440.
- Preminger G.M., Tiselius H.G., Assimos D.G. et al. EAU/AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi // J. Urol. -2007.-Vol. 178, No. 6.-P. 2418−2434.
- Rabii R., Joual A., Rais H. et al. Pyonephrosis: diagnosis and treatment: report of 14 cases // Ann. Urol. (Paris). 2000. — Vol. 34, No. 3. — P. 161−164.
- Radecka E., Magnusson A. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrostomies. A retrospective study // Acta Radiol. 2004. — Vol. 45, No. 2. — P. 184−188.
- Riedl C.R., Plas E" Iiubner W.A. et al. Bacterial colonization of ureteral stents // Eur. Urol. 1999. — Vol. 36, No. 1. — P. 53−59.
- Ringel A., Richter S., Shalev M., Nissenkorn I. Late complications of ureteral stents // Eur. Urol. 2000. — Vol. 38, No. 1. — P. 41−44.
- Ryan P.C., Lennon G.M., McLean P.A., Fitzpatrick J.M. The effects of acute and chronic JJ stent placement on upper urinary tract motility and calculus transit // Br. J. Urol. 1994. — Vol. 74, No. 4. — P. 434139.
- Sand.hu C., Anson K.M., Patel U. Urinary tract stones—Part II: current status of treatment // Clin. Radiol. 2003. — Vol. 58, No. 6. — P. 422−433.
- Sayed M.A., el-Taher A.M., Aboul-Ella H.A., Shaker S.E. Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management // BJU Int. 2001. — Vol. 88, No. 7. — P. 675−678.
- Schlenk E.A., Erlen J.A., Dunbar-Jacob J. et al. Health-related quality of life in chronic disorders: a comparison across studies using the MOS SF-36 // Qual. Life Res. 1998. — Vol. -7, No. l.-P. 57−65.
- Schmidt A., Volz C., Eisenberger F. The Dornier Lithotripter U 30: first clinical experience // J. Endourol. 1995. — Vol. 9, No. 5. — P. 363−366.
- Selmy G.I., Hassouna M.M., Begin L.R. et al. Long-term effects of ureteric stent after ureteric dilatation // J. Urol. 1993. — Vol. 150, No. 3. — P. 1984−1989.
- Shokeir A.A., Al Ansari A.A. Iatrogenic infections in urological practice: concepts of pathogenesis, prevention and management // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2006. — Vol. 40, No. 2.-P. 89−97.
- Sim L.S., Tan B.S., Yip S.K. et al. Single centre review of radiologically-guided percutaneous nephrostomies: a report of 273 procedures // Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore. 2002. — Vol. 31, No. 1. — P. 76−80.
- Singh I., Gupta N.P., Hemal A.K. et al. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors I I Urology. 2001. — Vol. 58, No. 4.-P. 526−531.
- Somers W.J. Management of forgotten or retained indwelling ureteral stents // Urology. 1996. — Vol. 47, No. 3. — P. 431−435.
- Soto Delgado M., Varo Solis C., Bachiller Burgos J., Beltran Aguilar V. Percutaneous nephrostomy as management technique of obstructive uropathy: review of 105 cases // Actas Urol. Esp. 2000. — Vol. 24, No. 7. — P. 568−572.
- Sozen S., Kiipeli В., Tunc L. et al. Management of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy: report of 500 patients // J. Endourol. 2003. — Vol. 17, No. 9. — P. 721−724.
- Srivastava A., Gupta R., Kumar A. et al. Routine stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi is unnecessary: results of a randomized controlled trial // J. Endourol.-2003.-Vol. 17, No. 10.-P. 871−874.
- Staios D., Andrews H.O., Shaik Т., Buchholz NN. Quality of life after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticulum and secluded lower-pole renal stones // J. Endourol. 2007. — Vol. 21, No. 5. — P. 515−519.
- Sullivan M. Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population // J. Clin. Epidemiol. -1998.-Vol. 51, No. 11.-P. 1105−1113.
- Tazi К., Moudouni S.M., Nouri M. et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: indications, techniques and results. Retrospective study of 81 cases 11 Ann. Urol. (Paris). 2000. -Vol. 34, No. 6. — P. 391−397.
- Tulloch W.B. Restoration of the continuity of the ureter by means of polythenetubing // Br. J. Urol. 1952. — Vol. 24. — P. 4215.
- Wah T.M., Weston M.J., Irving B.C. Percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: outcome data from a prospective multi-operator study at a UK training centre // Clin. Radiol. -2004.-Vol. 59, No. 3.-P. 255−261.
- Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36: conceptual framework and item selection // Med. Care. 1992. — Vol. 30. — P. 473—483.
- Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M.A. et al. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, 1993. — 143 p.
- Wirth В., Loch Т., Papadopoulos I., Schmidt S. Ureteral stenting using a combined antegrade/retrograde procedure. A technique for difficult cases // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1997. — Vol. 31, No. 1. — P. 35−37.
- Yossepowitch O., Lifshitz D.A., Dekel Y. el al. Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction // J. Urol. 2001. — Vol. 166, No. 5. — P. 1746−1749.
- Zimskind P.D., Fetter Т.К., Wilkerson J.L. Clinical use of long-term indwrelling silicone rubber ureteral splints injected cystoscopically // J. Urol. 1967. — Vol. 97. -P.840−844.
- Zisman A., Siegel Y.I., Siegmann A., Lindner A. Spontaneous ureteral stent fragmentation II J. Urol. 1995. — Vol. 153. — P. 718−721.